dekedangle_rpf_mod (
dekedangle_rpf_mod) wrote in
dekedangle_rpfanon2016-04-27 03:13 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
#23 — Brown Goes Down
This is the twenty-third post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 04:47 am (UTC)(link)but it's still light years better than half the fic on the hockey RPF tag on any given day.
lol I'm just going to assume you're friends with downjune or something.
FYI meme hating on Brandon Sutter (and hating on downjune's writing of Brandon Sutter as if he were a good player for us AS WELL AS her characterization of him and others) was not total, I will give you that. Because meme is never 100% in agreement on anything, duh.
But there was definitely way, way more than one of us. A large percentage of the people in those conversations actually. Just like there has been more than one of us complaining about her horrible Flower characterization, as the anon elsewhere mentioned.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 04:52 am (UTC)(link)I can honestly say I know nothing about downjune as a human and don't even know if she has a twitter or tumblr, which are the only spaces where I interact with this fandom outside of this meme, so no, I promise I'm not her friend. (Are we bringing back the "author's best buddy" meme here?)
But I just checked to make sure, and downjune hasn't written about Brandon Sutter in a YEAR, which is why I find the continued harping on that to be so fucking weird. As someone who came to her work for the Sid/Claude stuff (and who isn't a Pens fan), I don't know anything about those stories or the Flower ones, and I don't really care about them. But we're talking about her more recent Sid/Claude work in this thread, and continuing to bring up year-old grievances that have nothing to do with that is just kind of sad.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 04:56 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:00 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:01 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:01 am (UTC)(link)As well as making fun of someone for daring to have different opinions about fic than yours.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:02 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:05 am (UTC)(link)And now we have "everyone who disagrees must be the same person pretending to be different people" -- I feel like we could play meme-awfulness bingo with this subthread.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:08 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:08 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 04:57 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 04:53 am (UTC)(link)No, there was not some kind of majority agreement criticizing the way she writes Brandon Sutter. There was a fair bit of criticism of how her Sutter series was paced, but that was separate from any opinion of him as a player.
And you say all this as though there aren't lots of people on meme that also really like a lot of her stuff. A number of people have praised her Sid/Giroux stuff very highly, for example. Discussion of her fic has been far from uniformly negative.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:00 am (UTC)(link)I want someone to find it so I can show these liars that yes, several people were outright mocking downjune for continuing to write him as some kind of indispensable cog thus making it obvious she knew nothing whatsoever about hockey.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:03 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:06 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:08 am (UTC)(link)Because to me that's the question at stake. Some anon is saying it's just one person with a grudge when hello. It's clearly not.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:14 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:16 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:34 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:39 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:42 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:44 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:47 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 09:36 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:44 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:47 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:20 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:06 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:07 am (UTC)(link)http://dekedangle-rpfanon.dreamwidth.org/1099.html?thread=3532875#cmt3532875
I only got five email threads total out of the search, and the rest of them had way less to do with Sutter than than this one.
So try again.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:14 am (UTC)(link)Anyway. If we do have people here who can do searches, why aren't we searching for downjune. Surely that's a simpler way of finding discussions about her?
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-03 05:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:16 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:05 am (UTC)(link)tbf the only reason that people have praised her Crosby/Giroux stuff is because the quality of the rest of the fic for that pairing has been mostly crap. That doesn't mean downjune's stuff has become great. It's still average. I just like it better than the twitcrew messes.
But again, this Ryanne fic is reminding me of why I was turned off her Pens-centric stuff.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:12 am (UTC)(link)lol I'm just going to assume you're friends with downjune or something.
Written like someone who definitely has not ever tried reading everything in the hockey tag.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-03 05:21 am (UTC)(link)