dekedangle_rpfanon | #23 — Brown Goes Down

This is the twenty-third post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.

THE RULES

1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.

Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">

If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.

Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View

Next post opens at 5,000 comments.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

AYRT Yes. This is the best idea I've ever seen on meme.

If we are talking eyebrows, we have to mention Carey Price.

Brent Burns has surprisingly kempt eyebrows. They are of course terrific. How should this work? One player from each team? Only playoff teams?

Maybe one from each team in the league? Mostly because I want to include Sean Monahan. His eyebrows are a bit Vulcan-looking, which I can get behind.

Unless there are two brackets - one for playoffs and one for non-playoffs.

Yeah, I think one per team makes the most sense. And yes, Monahan does have good eyebrows.

Nonnies band together to select/confirm one guy from their team, then bracket elimination style from there until there is only one? (Brackets depending on which teams get candidates, of course.)

Okay, so all this talk had made me legitimately want to make a bracket that nonnies can vote on, if there's enough interest. If not, cool! I've very much enjoyed having my eyes opened to the wonders of some of these players' eyebrows.

A few logistics questions in case there is interest, though. We'd need nominees for each team (we've got a good start here, but I could start a separate thread to hash the rest out or even just make a poll where nonnies could nominate/vote if they want something more formal). And then after we have a nominee for each team, how would we want the brackets broken up: one huge bracket for the entire league, a bracket for each division, a bracket for each conference, or a bracket for playoffs teams and one for non-playoffs teams? Also, thoughts on seeding--just use league rank?

If you want a real bracket, you need some kind of wildcard bracket to start with, or else you need to add a couple more teams (I vote NWHL and CWHL as the two new ones) in order to get 32, ie, a power of 2.

AYRT

Oh, good point! I'd be fine with either a wildcard or adding a couple of NWHL/CWHL teams (maybe the Pride & Inferno since they were the cup winners?), depending on what people prefer.

ayrt

I'm good with any option that allows me to vote for Hilary Knight's eyebrows. :D

AYRT

I can only support this, as her eyebrows are great. And it looks like the Inferno have some good candidates, too. :D

I'd say a separate thread with eyebrows in the title so that people can block it or ignore it easily if they don't want to take part.

Nonnie who first suggested it
Yes, I think a separate thread. I vote nominations be done in that thread just by having people list the team name and nominee with one subthread per team (without changing the subject line, unless the demand gets too great, which I don't think it will). So, I go:

Capitals - Tom Wilson

And if no one responds, he's the nom. If someone +1s, he's the nom. If someone disagrees, by going:

Capitals - TJ Oshie

Then it's just number of votes and the tiebreaker is, IDK, a coin flip or something.

I do think 32 teams makes sense. No idea about seeding.

sounds like a plan!

Sounds good! I'll move things over to another thread so uninterested nonnies can more easily block/ignore.

#23 — Brown Goes Down

Re: Game Day Thread May 7, 2016

Re: Game Day Thread May 7, 2016

Re: Game Day Thread May 7, 2016

Re: Game Day Thread May 7, 2016

Re: Game Day Thread May 7, 2016

Re: Game Day Thread May 7, 2016

Re: Game Day Thread May 7, 2016

Re: Game Day Thread May 7, 2016

Re: Game Day Thread May 7, 2016

Re: Game Day Thread May 7, 2016

Re: Game Day Thread May 7, 2016

Re: Game Day Thread May 7, 2016

Re: Game Day Thread May 7, 2016

Re: Game Day Thread May 7, 2016

Re: Game Day Thread May 7, 2016