dekedangle_rpf_mod (
dekedangle_rpf_mod) wrote in
dekedangle_rpfanon2016-04-27 03:13 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
#23 — Brown Goes Down
This is the twenty-third post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
Re: Fic Discussion- Still and Again
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 04:04 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion- Still and Again
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 06:26 pm (UTC)(link)I mean, I don't have a problem with age difference and teenagers getting married per se, but this was just kind of a weirdly handled and unnecessary detail. It would have been basically the exact same story if the author had stuck closer to the RL timeline, in which Danny didn't join the Flyers until a year later and Claude didn't move in until way later. I still wouldn't have loved the de-aging thing, but it wouldn't have had the extra sheen of skeeviness in that case.
Re: Fic Discussion- Still and Again
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 06:36 pm (UTC)(link)I wouldn't really call it stockholm or anything like that, as Claude chooses to go with Danny and could leave at any time, but the combination of age + soulbond + predetermination (Claude knows they end up happily married) does make it kind of weird. I liked it a lot on first read-through, but I think a lot of the skeeviness could have been eliminated if you just change one of those three factors.
Re: Fic Discussion- Still and Again
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 07:04 pm (UTC)(link)Do you normally enjoy soulbond fic, especially when there's 24/7 psychic telepathy involved? I do think the author's focus on the age difference gave it kind of a weirdness, but not having had Claude move in when they bonded and they're reading each other's minds and emotions, and this has happened to them both without either one choosing it, strikes me equally as weird, and I was wondering if you're one of those people that finds soulbonds skeevy in general?
I actually think it would have been less skeevy if the age difference had not been mentioned at all, and they'd either just got right on with the physical side and the complication was building the familial relationship or else if they'd both wanted to wait, rather than the author having them wait and then not wanting to make it sound like either of them found the other unattractive, so introducing the age objection on Danny's part.
Re: Fic Discussion- Still and Again
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 07:53 pm (UTC)(link)I found the focus on the age difference when they first bonded, rather than Danny having three kids already whom Claude essentially might become a step-dad to at an age where most people not have even one child and might not even have thought about having a family in the near future really weird.
Re: Fic Discussion- Still and Again
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)I agree. Especially since in the end, the fic sort of ends on that note of Claude & the kids it would have made more sense for that to be the focus. But during the actual fic they mostly took a backseat to the other storyline.
Re: Fic Discussion- Still and Again
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion- Still and Again
(Anonymous) 2016-05-12 04:16 am (UTC)(link)But the actual worst part is that I got sucked in despite myself, kept reading and cried all over again about the ending. Fuck you, book >>>>>:(
Re: Fic Discussion- Still and Again
(Anonymous) 2016-05-12 09:52 am (UTC)(link)It was embarrassing.