dekedangle_rpf_mod: mod icon of a puck by a goal net on ice (puck on ice)
dekedangle_rpf_mod ([personal profile] dekedangle_rpf_mod) wrote in [community profile] dekedangle_rpfanon2016-04-27 03:13 pm

#23 — Brown Goes Down

This is the twenty-third post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.

THE RULES


1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means. 
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.





Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">

If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post

Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View

Next post opens at 5,000 comments.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 03:19 pm (UTC)(link)
NA who could not give less of a shit who Sidney Crosby sticks his dick into in RL or fiction agrees with everything in this comment.

Fic written to score points (SJ, shipping, bottom/top wank, ur tinhat is dumb, wtfever kind of points) against other fans is inevitably boring. In this case, if the fic is great and not written for that purpose but the commenters are using it to score points, they're not doing their pairing or their thoughts on supposed misogynist tinhats any good.

It's not a good look. But I know, I know, nobody cares what I or anyone else thinks so you all continue to do you.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 03:30 pm (UTC)(link)
But no one can say that the fillers are writing out of spite? Or that the commenters are commenting out of spite?* It's just the bitter OP's sixth sense talking. So this is all moot.

*I commented on a Sid/Kathy fill and it wasn't to spite tinhatters. I liked the particular fill and I like the pairing.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 03:35 pm (UTC)(link)
You're right. Nobody cares what you think.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 03:37 pm (UTC)(link)
na

Completely agreed. And there's a lot of proving the OP's point in this thread, so whatever.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 03:41 pm (UTC)(link)
One person saying that they dislike tinhatters *in addition to* liking the pairing for itself?

Oh yes, so much proving of the OP's point that obviously no one truly likes Sid/Kathy, everyone is just pretending to spite the crazy tinhatters.

Get out of here.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 03:44 pm (UTC)(link)
What even is OP's point? I can't tell, and I can't ask them since they tucked their tail between their legs hours ago and ran away. Don't know what you're still doing here.

From what I can gather, they feel Sid/Kathy commenters seem congratulatory because it's het and it upsets them to see people enjoying het? I fail to understand how that's being "proved" in this thread. But please. Continue on this transparent path you've set for yourself.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 04:35 pm (UTC)(link)
na What is this weird obsession some people on meme have about when comments can happen? The idea that you only have x amount of minutes/hours to reply or the topic is off limits? This isn't someone replying to 2 week old wank.

People have lives/jobs/school and aren't on meme 24/7. Discussions that weren't occurring when I checked last night are somehow too old now that it is lunch time the next day. You have a seriously unrealistic idea about the time scale of these conversations and expecting people to be on meme at your convenience.

You don't own the conversation and get to decide who participates.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 06:59 pm (UTC)(link)
OP pretty clearly explained themselves multiple times, IDK why you expect them to keep repeating themselves to anons who clearly have some pretty extensive blinders and selective hearing.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 04:11 pm (UTC)(link)
+1

Honestly, the sheer amount of comments to someone essentially saying "some comments struck me as self-congratulatory in nature" is pretty wtf. Oh no, someone in a fandom venting thread said that some comments sounded a little bit to them like some shippers thought they were superior to others for bullshit reasons! That's definitely something that has to be argued because it's so uncommon and a huge insult to everyone who ships that thing!