dekedangle_rpf_mod: mod icon of a puck by a goal net on ice (puck on ice)
dekedangle_rpf_mod ([personal profile] dekedangle_rpf_mod) wrote in [community profile] dekedangle_rpfanon2016-04-27 03:13 pm

#23 — Brown Goes Down

This is the twenty-third post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.

THE RULES


1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means. 
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.





Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">

If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post

Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View

Next post opens at 5,000 comments.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-15 05:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Hee. I lost it when they claimed there was less misogyny in fic. I am suspicious of the idea this person was active in fanfic in the 90s and has an actual basis for comparison of how fandom has changed.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-15 05:46 pm (UTC)(link)
...eight years ago was in the late 00s. Where fandom was just picking up on tumblr. They have no basis for comparison other than being exposed to older archives.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-15 06:15 pm (UTC)(link)
8 years ago? They are an Na, not the 12-year old anon.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-15 05:47 pm (UTC)(link)
NA Yup. And I remember there being a lot more poly fic back in the day, tbh, at least in the fandoms I read.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-15 05:53 pm (UTC)(link)
And a lot more gen fic and case fic, etc. etc. The issue in wanting more variety in fic is that you have to not have very narrow definitions of acceptability. The mentality that defines what is OK in fictional depiction is the same mentality that limits variety in fic, and the fact that they profess to want more varieties of fic and not want certain things to exist shows that they actually don't.

If you want more poly and ace and etc. fic, you gotta be OK with people tackling those topics in a way you don't approve of, since not every attempt will be successful. The 'write more kinds of stuff but only exactly within these narrow confines of acceptability' is exactly the kind of thinking that leads to less variety of fic.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-15 06:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Absolutely. It isn't variety if everything has to fit within someone's (whose?) specific parameters or not exist.

(Poly just came to my mind first there because lately I've been wondering if it's worth trying to track down some of the LoTR rpf stories I enjoyed several computers ago, without remembering either author names or titles.)

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-15 06:27 pm (UTC)(link)
It isn't variety if everything has to fit within someone's (whose?) specific parameters or not exist.

Yes, the "whose paramaters?" question is a really important one, because these conversations tend to assume that we all know which things are bad in fiction and which are good, but actually there is a very wide range of opinions on that subject! So it generally boils down to whatever the commenter in question personally finds questionable.