dekedangle_rpf_mod: mod icon of a puck by a goal net on ice (puck on ice)
dekedangle_rpf_mod ([personal profile] dekedangle_rpf_mod) wrote in [community profile] dekedangle_rpfanon2016-04-27 03:13 pm

#23 — Brown Goes Down

This is the twenty-third post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.

THE RULES


1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means. 
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.





Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">

If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post

Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View

Next post opens at 5,000 comments.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 06:26 pm (UTC)(link)
You're the kind of person that clicks through to catch up on what you've missed, though. A lot of people don't. I'm not in favor of changing dates multiple times, if that really happened, but there's obvious reasons for it.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
ayrt

I guess I still don't understand the obvious reason for it (honestly).

To me at least it reads as some misguided belief that people are ~so anxious~ to read something by a particular author that their story deserves a higher profile than anyone else's. And that's not fair to the rest of the authors who play roulette and accept where their story shows up in the list. Without needing to manipulate the system.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 06:54 pm (UTC)(link)
The obvious reason to change the date is to get more kudos and comments. It has nothing to do with thinking that people are anxious for a particular author? That doesn't even make sense. It's to get more kudos and comments, because more people see your story.

In this case, I don't even think you can call it manipulating the system yet. Nobody's played "roulette" here. Some people turned in their stories early and some people right at the deadline, and there's nothing wrong with changing your fic date to when the stories were due versus when you originally uploaded your draft. Now if she changed it again tomorrow, that would be manipulating things, but I have the same gripe with people who don't backdate old fic that they are just now adding to AO3, and nobody finds the reason for that mysterious.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 07:46 pm (UTC)(link)
da

Old fic is a different story. Here, she was a handful of stories down when I looked last night, and right at the top in the morning. It's not like it was a huge ficathon that flooded the tag, either. She just wanted to make dead cert hers was the first thing people saw, which is definitely gaming the system. I understand it with an anon exchange where early finishers would get penalized because their stories show up a week earlier, but if she was so anxious about getting eyeballs, wait and post it in the morning? It's not like the fandom police were going to come after her for posting slightly late to the exchange.

It's just tacky. Nobody else who posted around the same time as her adjusted their dates, as far as I can tell, so she's basically just stepping on them to make sure she gets hits. That's why people complain.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)
It's people trying to position their fic to maximize their hits. It's the exact same story.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 08:24 pm (UTC)(link)
It's obviously a matter of degree. If I post a 7 year old story to a popular tag, no one will ever see it. Posting at night and then fiddling with the date to move your story up a handful of spots in the morning is ridiculous.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)
na

I mean, it probably is ridiculous but I don't get why people are so upset about it. People checking the tag often enough to notice a story moving a few spots weren't going to miss anything new that got posted anyway. So you have to see the summary twice, big deal.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 07:47 pm (UTC)(link)
I just added a bunch of (non hockey) stuff to AO3 and TBH I was not going to go back and look at the exact date I posted each fic. Instead I just added a "originally posted in" note in the summary.

Re: Fandom Venting

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)
I guess I understand backdating if you're about to flood the tag otherwise, but honestly I'd rather the 'originally posted in' note in general - otherwise I'm likely to miss it completely, and there's no guarantee that I'll have seen it on the original platform.