dekedangle_rpf_mod: mod icon of a puck by a goal net on ice (puck on ice)
dekedangle_rpf_mod ([personal profile] dekedangle_rpf_mod) wrote in [community profile] dekedangle_rpfanon2016-04-27 03:13 pm

#23 — Brown Goes Down

This is the twenty-third post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.

THE RULES


1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means. 
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.





Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">

If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post

Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View

Next post opens at 5,000 comments.

Re: Fic Discussion

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 10:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Surely you can't just c/p Panarin for Kane, though. Like, I would hope Panarin's characterization would be different? Also you've got the age difference with Panarain/Toews that you don't have with K/T without an AU.

I can kinda see what people are saying in terms of superficial appearances, but as characters Panarin and Kane just seem like they would be totally different.

Re: Fic Discussion

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I was the anon the ayrt was talking to, and -- if she and I are talking about the same fic, the only reason why you couldn't just c/p Panarin for Kane was because Panarin's Russian-ness was remarked on a few times. That was his only distinct characterization; everything else you could absolutely just c/p one for the other.

Re: Fic Discussion

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Surely you can't just c/p Panarin for Kane, though. Like, I would hope Panarin's characterization would be different?

So how's your first day in fandom treating you?

Re: Fic Discussion

(Anonymous) 2016-05-17 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Other than the occasional patronizing asshole, I'm enjoying myself quite a bit!