dekedangle_rpf_mod: mod icon of a puck by a goal net on ice (puck on ice)
[personal profile] dekedangle_rpf_mod posting in [community profile] dekedangle_rpfanon
This is the twenty-third post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.

THE RULES


1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means. 
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.





Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">

If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post

Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View

Next post opens at 5,000 comments.

Re: Kinkmeme Discussion

From: (Anonymous)
The fact that you can't provide receipts shows that this fandom does not okay and fill infidelity prompts on the regular while crazy Penguins fandom ungenuinely attack such prompts for misogyny.

It just proves that your assertion that there are "plenty" of times where this type of side-eyeing does not occur is bullshit. You don't need to lie as a way to derail the central fact: that the prompt should have been called out for both misogyny and creepiness and the only people doing so are the ones you can psychically "tell" were ungenuine.

Re: Kinkmeme Discussion

From: (Anonymous)
ayrt

Uh, yeah, I do find it concerning when people leverage concepts like misogyny to make accusations and attacks that aren't rooted in real concern about misogyny. I'm not talking about reading people's minds to determine if they are ~genuinely against misogyny, I'm talking about arguments being made based on bad, harmful logic. If you think I'm wasting my time, cool, but what are you doing continuing to try to argue with me, about what? Things we agree on? That I shouldn't care about the things I care about?

Re: Things You Wouldn't Admit Unanon

From: (Anonymous)
This is me and the entire devils roster excrpt for Schneider. They all look like non-descript dads to me.

Actually, forevery team in the NHL I can identify at least three or more faces but for the Devils it's just Schneider. And then all the dad faces.

Re: Kinkmeme Discussion

From: (Anonymous)
You're right. You clearly have too much time on your hands, why am I letting you waste mine? Peace out.

Re: Kinkmeme Discussion

From: (Anonymous)
DA - No. The prompt should not have been called out at all. It's the kinkmeme.

http://thesinbin.dreamwidth.org/3790.html?thread=4232910#cmt4232910 any/any UST for another player makes a player realise his marriage is over.

http://thesinbin.dreamwidth.org/3088.html?thread=3294480#cmt3294480 ekbald/ mitchell infidelity
http://thesinbin.dreamwidth.org/1580.html?thread=2660908#cmt2660908 any/any infidelity

Re: Kinkmeme Discussion

From: (Anonymous)
ayrt

I can't provide receipts because I don't track or bookmark anything on the kinkmeme that doesn't interest me. I haven't proven my point, but my failure to do it hasn't proven me wrong. I don't know why you are bringing "crazy Penguins fandom" into it unless you're a crazy defensive Pens fan.

Honestly, the fact that I did bring up one example and you defended it the way you did actually does prove exactly the point I was trying to make. Your point is based on men -- one reviled by fandom, one loved by fandom -- and has nothing to do with RL women. I don't need to psychically tell anything about anyone to understand that some things were said that are dubious. I also didn't say that all the accusations of misogyny and creepiness were ungenuine -- I think that some of them were, and it was the most wrong-headed of them that created the most wank.

Re: Kinkmeme Discussion

From: (Anonymous)
lol you linked to a prompt where it's not even clear who is cheating on who. it's pointed out in the one and only comment too.

Re: Kinkmeme Discussion

From: (Anonymous)
people who accuse others of misogyny because they're protective of their fandom bbs are doing the lord's work, but someone concerned about the harm of misusing something as important and serious as misogyny for fandom wank purposes has too much time on their hands...

Re: Kinkmeme Discussion

From: (Anonymous)
AYRT That you doubt who is cheating on who is a demonstration of your misogyny in erasing Willie Mitchell's wife.

Re: Kinkmeme Discussion

From: (Anonymous)
lol are you tripping?

What's Up With Your Team? - The Final Four

From: (Anonymous)
Playoffs round 3 coming up! How do you feel about it? If your team has gotten knocked out/was never in, who are you rooting for now?

Re: What's Up With Your Team? - The Final Four

From: (Anonymous)
My team didn't make the playoffs, but I'm okay with the Pens, Bolts or Blues winning. In that order.

Fuck the Sharks.

Re: Women's Hockey

From: (Anonymous)
Agreed. Why not just use the Rivs' logo? I'm not a Rangers fan and wouldn't necessarily want that association.

Re: What's Up With Your Team? - The Final Four

From: (Anonymous)
Exactly my feelings, nonnie, except the Bolts and Blues are pretty well tied for me.

Re: What's Up With Your Team? - The Final Four

From: (Anonymous)
My team did, but now that I'm dead inside, those are my thoughts.

Re: What's Up With Your Team? - The Final Four

From: (Anonymous)
I don't care about the Bolts, I hate the Blues, I'm mildly in favor of the Pens for Daley's sake, but I'm mostly rooting for the Sharks. I warmed to Pavelski and Burns at the ASG and I have some sympathy for their plethora of Sad Cupless Old Guys(tm). Plus I have residual fondness for Dills.

Re: What's Up With Your Team? - The Final Four

From: (Anonymous)
NA I warmed to Pavelski and Burns at the ASG too, so I guess the Sharks it is for me too.

Re: What's Up With Your Team? - The Final Four

From: (Anonymous)
Team #anyonebutthepens.

Re: What's Up With Your Team? - The Final Four

From: (Anonymous)
I'm rooting for the NHL to cancel the rest of the playoffs.

That seems slightly unrealistic tho, so I'm rooting for the Sharks. But I'd be okay with the Penguins winning too, because of Daley.

Re: What's Up With Your Team? - The Final Four

From: (Anonymous)
I'm rooting for a Sharks - Lightning final, for maximum "BUT IT DOESN'T EVEN SNOW THERE!!!" wailing.

Re: What's Up With Your Team? - The Final Four

From: (Anonymous)
+1

Re: What's Up With Your Team? - The Final Four

From: (Anonymous)
+2

Re: What's Up With Your Team? - The Final Four

From: (Anonymous)
lol yes, that would be great!

Re: What's Up With Your Team? - The Final Four

From: (Anonymous)
Now that my team's been knocked out I have less than zero interest in the rest of the playoffs. I don't care a bit about any of the teams left, so there's no one to transfer my rooting interest to. (I kind of want to see Jumbo Joe get a cup, but not enough to watch any games.)

Re: Women's Hockey

From: (Anonymous)
It's especially weird because unlike the Beauts and Pride, there isn't just one "local" NHL team to act as the male counterpart. The Rivs play in Brooklyn; if they have to pick one allegiance, it should be to the Isles. And as a Devils fan who picked the Rivs as her NWHL team because of the local connection, I would rather set myself on fire than let anyone assume I'm a Rangers fan. Sorry, Best Kessel.