Meh. Far as I know everyone involved has said that was a bunch of really hurtful BS, and I'm not a big fan of anyone being tried and judged forever more via rumor and social media, but I understand not being able to 'unfeel' that uneasiness/ick factor. That said, I always found the oh-so-handsome Sharpy thing more of a laugh - like yeah, with the right lighting and grooming he was more basically symmetrical & a generic 1950s chiselled features Clark Kent white boy version of handsome than many hockey players, but he was/is always way more interesting and attractive to me for what he brings on the ice and to team dynamic than for his face.
(OTT aside I know it's a typo but 'cheating tumors' has to be the best tongue-in-cheek euphemism for metastatic cancer I've seen in a while...)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
Re: Things You Wouldn't Say Unanon
From: (Anonymous)Meh. Far as I know everyone involved has said that was a bunch of really hurtful BS, and I'm not a big fan of anyone being tried and judged forever more via rumor and social media, but I understand not being able to 'unfeel' that uneasiness/ick factor. That said, I always found the oh-so-handsome Sharpy thing more of a laugh - like yeah, with the right lighting and grooming he was more basically symmetrical & a generic 1950s chiselled features Clark Kent white boy version of handsome than many hockey players, but he was/is always way more interesting and attractive to me for what he brings on the ice and to team dynamic than for his face.
(OTT aside I know it's a typo but 'cheating tumors' has to be the best tongue-in-cheek euphemism for metastatic cancer I've seen in a while...)