She's been arguing all season that Fleury = bad, Murray = good so it's not surprising to me. And as I said earlier, since she pointed it out I can't unsee the bias either except I don't think it's some grand anti-Murray conspiracy. I think they're just really obsessed with Fleury, to go along with the media and the majority of fans.
Speaking of Wilson, he had a really good article about this http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Ryan-Wilson/Goalie-insurance/177/84628
This part: "The people who have contact with him will drown everything out with Fleury's affable personality, his smile, and his pranking ways. None of which are a negative. I repeat, none of those things are a negative. However, the more access somebody has to Marc-Andre Fleury the less capable they are of providing objectively accurate hockey analysis." I think this is really true. And if you're someone who thinks Fleury = bad, that must drive you nuts.
Re: Ask Meme
Speaking of Wilson, he had a really good article about this http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/Ryan-Wilson/Goalie-insurance/177/84628
This part: "The people who have contact with him will drown everything out with Fleury's affable personality, his smile, and his pranking ways. None of which are a negative. I repeat, none of those things are a negative. However, the more access somebody has to Marc-Andre Fleury the less capable they are of providing objectively accurate hockey analysis." I think this is really true. And if you're someone who thinks Fleury = bad, that must drive you nuts.