dekedangle_rpf_mod (
dekedangle_rpf_mod) wrote in
dekedangle_rpfanon2017-04-06 05:59 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
#29 – Lay, Lie, or Laine?
This is the twenty-ninth post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-25 04:36 am (UTC)(link)I don't know where you getting the speedreading thing, either - I posted about the remix collection opening, and it took quite a while before anybody at all commented with their impressions of any of the fic.
Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-25 09:11 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-25 09:20 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-25 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)I'm the person who originally brought up missing exchange fic threads, and I don't care where they're located. I just miss when we used to create subthreads for each fic for people to drop their comments into whenever they got around to reading.
Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-25 09:31 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-25 09:36 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-25 09:41 pm (UTC)(link)I think there were a couple of reasons it hasn't happened so much, one was that time that someone created like 90 separate threads in one go for some exchange with a fairly unique system for sorting them. And not every fic has something that needs saying about it, I am one of the people who does discuss exchange fic and I only tend to have something to say about a quarter of them.
Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-26 05:56 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-26 06:10 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-26 06:27 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-26 06:36 pm (UTC)(link)I think the fandom's less critical than it used to be. Or harsh. Or either. But I really do enjoy when people do reviews/discussion for readers and not other writers. (not every reader actually writes fic on a regular basis, or even at all)
If you have something to say about a fic, post about it. Even if it's old.
Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-26 06:41 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-26 06:43 pm (UTC)(link)lol rereading my comment i realise i come across as a whiny baby, but what can you do.
Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-26 06:53 pm (UTC)(link)Same, but that's mostly because there hasn't really been much that I loved so much that my need to squee can't be satisfied by a kudos and commenting to the author, or a WIP that I want to discuss hypotheses about, or something complex enough to warrant unpacking.
Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-26 07:33 pm (UTC)(link)It does feel like lately, maybe the last few months or this season even, there's been less longfic or works posted by "big" writers. I think there's been some great shorter rarepair fic, but nothing is really emerging as the next big thing, aside from Marner/Matthews which hasn't really had any well written long fic yet (that I know of and I'm not really paying too much attention). Maybe if something new takes off like them or Vesey/Skjei, Draisitl/McDavid etc. we'll see more discussion.
Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-26 10:51 pm (UTC)(link)But I also think that weirdly, we're in a time when it's harder to write fic. The lockout kept everything stable that year for a longer while in terms of team rosters, etc., which led to a lot of fic being written (including longer fic), which then got read and recced and brought in a lot of new fans the next year.
Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-26 07:06 pm (UTC)(link)if the fic is mostly good, but has something which could be better or is interesting and I would like to see in a different fic then I might go to fic discussion.
Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-26 07:12 pm (UTC)(link)I agree that's a big reason for the drop off in posting. But I don't think it's the only reason.
Re: Discussion Thread
(Anonymous) 2017-04-25 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)My point was that often there ISN'T any discussion happening, even if a thread has been created.