dekedangle_rpf_mod: Hanson Bro from Slapshot (pic#7957183)
[personal profile] dekedangle_rpf_mod posting in [community profile] dekedangle_rpfanon
This is the eleventh post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.

THE RULES


1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.

Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">

Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View

Next post opens at 5,000 comments.

Re: 30-in-30: Toronto Maple Leafs - Steve Dangle

From: (Anonymous)
DA

On the topic of other hockey podcasts:

I just recently discovered Two Bearded Ladies which is a Stars and general hockey podcast, which I've enjoyed so far. One of the women who does it is @classlicity on Twitter, who does some stats stuff that I've started following (haven't been following her long enough to know if I agree with her analytics approach and conclusions, but it seems promising so far).

Re: 30-in-30: Toronto Maple Leafs - Steve Dangle

From: (Anonymous)
There's actually a small stash of Stars-audio related stuff, which surprised me a little.

Re: 30-in-30: Toronto Maple Leafs - Steve Dangle

From: (Anonymous)
I doubt the podcast is, but are they themselves fannish? This might sound hypocritical, but I'm always looking for hockey blogs and podcasts by woman who aren't, cause I feel like even if they don't mention the RPF side, that vibe still trickles in somehow.

Re: 30-in-30: Toronto Maple Leafs - Steve Dangle

From: (Anonymous)
na

I don't know if they are, but they do have a bit of the same conversational vibe from the couple of podcasts I listened to. Sometimes it works for me and sometimes it doesn't, but I wasn't really a fan.

Re: 30-in-30: Toronto Maple Leafs - Steve Dangle

From: (Anonymous)
na

one of them definitely is. I used to follow her on tumblr (and had to unfollow, but that's a different story entirely). I can't say for sure if the other one is, though.

Re: 30-in-30: Toronto Maple Leafs - Steve Dangle

From: (Anonymous)
yeah... she can be a bit much.

Re: 30-in-30: Toronto Maple Leafs - Steve Dangle

From: (Anonymous)
Is it just general "a bit much"-ness, or did something happen? I don't know who they are at all.

Re: 30-in-30: Toronto Maple Leafs - Steve Dangle

From: (Anonymous)
da

just a general "a bit much"-ness, imo. she (at least on her tumblr when I followed her) is obsessed with Jamie Benn and expressed it in a fashion that was just too over the top for me.

Re: 30-in-30: Toronto Maple Leafs - Steve Dangle

From: (Anonymous)
ayrt

what the other anon said. just a bit overzealous for my tastes. and she holds weird grudges for players i really like, like gabe landeskog, which can be off-putting.

Re: 30-in-30: Toronto Maple Leafs - Steve Dangle

From: (Anonymous)
ayrt

I imagine they probably are, but, tbh, most of the women I know in hockey sports fandom--almost all of whom I met not through fannish venues--are fannish in some respect. Many of them absolutely refuse to be fannish about hockey--or keep their fannish lives and their sports fan lives so totally separate that I don't know if they're into Hockey RPF, so I don't know if such a unicorn exists?

From the few eps of the podcast I've listened to, they sound like your basic millennial chicks who like hockey: very internet savvy, so subject to mentioning memes and tropes the online world is rife with; feminist, so they spent a good bit of time on the Kane thing and how he sucks (with ample trigger warnings--which are no longer just a fannish thing--before they discussed it so it could be skipped); sports fans who know a lot about hockey and their team but also other teams; ladies who crush on boys, so they mention the attractiveness of various players and their crushes.

You may not enjoy it, but I have so far. I don't know either of the ladies who do the show, so I have no idea of their fannish involvement. It doesn't come up on the podcast, nor is the podcast redolent of fannishness the way Wait, Wait, What's Icing? is.