dekedangle_rpf_mod (
dekedangle_rpf_mod) wrote in
dekedangle_rpfanon2016-04-27 03:13 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
#23 — Brown Goes Down
This is the twenty-third post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 10:40 pm (UTC)(link)I don't think she's talking about bullies in Juniors though. I think she's talking about the stories of Juniors teams treating women like shit a la the rumors about Taylor Hall and Zack Kassian.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)/Jeff Marek voice
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)If it's men's hockey and women's hockey, it can damn well be juniors. Jeff Marek is not the boss of me. Thank goodness, because he's kind of an ass.
And why wouldn't it be juniors anyway? You're talking about at least three different leagues, if not more.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)Because it's the Major Junior hockey league. Quebec Major Junior Hockey League, right? Sid wasn't in all three different leagues; no one is.
It's also meant to differentiate between Major Junior and World Juniors, which is a different thing.
Think of how weird this sounds: "When I was in Nationals Hockey League...I had this teammate back in Nationals..." It's just wrong.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 11:38 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)They mostly seem to refer specifically to "the Q" and "the O", instead. I don't remember what they call the third one.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-10 23:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-10 23:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)I did a search and came to the conclusion that NHL.com tends to use juniors more than junior. Junior is usually used as an adjective, eg junior team, whereas juniors stands alone. See this article for examples of both: https://www.nhl.com/news/clock-ticks-for-junior-aged-prospects-on-nhl-rosters/c-736544 At one point junior is used as a standalone, but it's usually juniors.
A broader search showed that media sources also tend to use juniors over junior.
I'm not saying you're wrong necessarily about how it should be, just that common usage is a thing, and it seems to be a thing pointing towards juniors.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)Bless you and your researching ways, anon.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 00:13 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 11:57 pm (UTC)(link)So, your objection is only to when the Q is spoken about? When people are talking about the leagues as a group or the Dub or the O (neither of which have major junior in their name), you don't care if they use juniors? That seems a very narrow rule.
Think of how weird this sounds: "When I was in Nationals Hockey League...I had this teammate back in Nationals..." It's just wrong.
It sounds wrong, because that's not the equivalent. It's the equivalent of "pros" or "minors." When I was in the pros. You wouldn't say "when I was in the pro" or "when I was in the minor." That's just wrong.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 12:08 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 00:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-10 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)Looking at it again, you might be right - I can't tell from context exactly in what way junior hockey boys are meant to be horrible. My mind went to the bullying because that seemed more likely to fit coming from Sid's perspective, I think.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 02:46 am (UTC)(link)Maaaaybe if Sid was pretty much just expecting to raise his kid alone and paralleled Ryanne a lot more, but that's not where this seemed to end up.
See, there's where it felt like it was going to me. The difference is that Claude is going to be adjacent to the kid of someone he's in love with, as opposed to being adjacent to the kid of someone he's not in love with.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 12:09 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 12:17 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 12:18 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 12:19 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 12:27 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 01:03 pm (UTC)(link)Kid: So Claude. Let's discuss the grossness of the incident where you laid hands on another person without their permission.
Claude: Be quiet. Can't you see I'm adjacent to you?
Kid: Okay. *turns to Sid* Dad, why have you never spoken out against the homophobia, sexism and racism in the NHL despite being apparently Determined to teach me to stand against these things that are so endemic in Junior?
Sid: new phone, who dis?
Claude: *is adjacent*
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 01:16 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 01:27 pm (UTC)(link)It seems like that's what downjune is saying, considering that Sid proceeds as if the adoptive kid will definitely play hockey. Which was followed by my personal favorite line - Sid would be happy to have a female child since there's now a paying women's league. A women's league where salaries are a pittance and many players can't live off them. Awesome.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 13:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 13:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-11 16:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 01:30 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-13 03:01 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 04:32 pm (UTC)(link)Yeah, I was seriously side-eyeing that. It all just seems so utterly dismissive of Claude's existing kid and his responsibility to her. No one is obligated to want or have kids, but if you do have them, you need to treat them right, regardless of your own feelings about parenthood. You don't get to just disclaim that because you don't love their other parent.
Re: Fic Discussion
(Anonymous) 2016-05-11 07:53 pm (UTC)(link)Tbh I never understood why she even felt the need to include Claude's potential future kid, then have him be a terrible dad to her because he's not in love with the mom (who's also named after his irl gf, which doesn't sit exactly right with me either) in the first place.