dekedangle_rpf_mod: mod icon of a puck by a goal net on ice (puck on ice)
[personal profile] dekedangle_rpf_mod posting in [community profile] dekedangle_rpfanon
This is the twenty-third post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.

THE RULES


1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means. 
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.





Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">

If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post

Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View

Next post opens at 5,000 comments.

Re: Fandom Venting

From: (Anonymous)
Is someone going to create a separate Fandom Venting thread about how venting about conversation going on else where on the meme is their pet peeve?

Re: Fandom Venting

From: (Anonymous)
At least it's an attempt to not pour gas on the fire. It's not like someone commenting, "Everyone, shut the fuck up," is ever effective.

Re: Fandom Venting

From: (Anonymous)
No, it's like saying the same thing really loudly, from the next room, and then being surprised when people can hear.

Re: Fandom Venting

From: (Anonymous)
The whole point of posting comments on a public forum is for them to be read. It's a way to vent (the purpose of the thread!) without being directly confrontational, especially in a way that targets a single person/comment.

Re: Fandom Venting

From: (Anonymous)
Lol, OK. So, it's to be read, but not by the person who you're aiming it at.

Re: Fandom Venting

From: (Anonymous)
What is the point of a venting thread, if not to be read, but not by the people you're aiming at, lol?

Re: Fandom Venting

From: (Anonymous)
the point of sub-tweeting/commenting is never that the other person won't hear it.

Re: Fandom Venting

From: (Anonymous)
But it is to be vague enough for plausible deniability. Whereas ... this is not that. Subtweeting would be going on tumblr and being like, 'it's so terrible that some people use terms in psychology incorrectly and they don't understand that that's wrong and hurtful.' Not posting in another thread on a low-traffic meme.

Re: Fandom Venting

From: (Anonymous)
I'm just happy that it's in a thread with an appropriate title.

Although, given the particular title of the fic discussion that went off the rails...

Re: Fandom Venting

From: (Anonymous)
I feel like in this situation they could have just stated their opinion about the term in a reply to the person using it, if you really don't want to talk about something starting a venting thread about it isn't really the way to go about it.

Re: Fandom Venting

From: (Anonymous)
They didn't sound like they didn't want to talk about, they sounded like they wanted to point out something about it, to the multiple people who are now using it.

Re: Fandom Venting

From: (Anonymous)
If it's a vent, then it's appropriate for the venting thread. It is not more complicated than that.

Re: Fandom Venting

From: (Anonymous)
it's not effective, but god am i tempted to do it anyway at times.