dekedangle_rpf_mod (
dekedangle_rpf_mod) wrote in
dekedangle_rpfanon2016-05-20 08:02 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
#24 – Not Sure If Serious or Playing Dumba
This is the twenty-fourth post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)Good argument: The Sharks should win because they have the best beards.
Bad (not silly enough) argument: The Sharks should win because they have more guys that haven't won the cup.
I feel like we should throw this open to all the other teams, too - why does your team deserve the cup this year, even if they didn't make it to the final?
Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 09:24 pm (UTC)(link)Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 09:28 pm (UTC)(link)Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 09:29 pm (UTC)(link)Anyway, it's a black cat, so you will get very differing opinions on whether or not that's a point in the Sharks favor! (Full disclosure: I also have a black cat, and she's delightful, but I have never won the Stanley Cup since I got her. HMM.)
Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 09:31 pm (UTC)(link)The Sharks are such a weird team at this point that even bad luck becomes good luck for them. Look at how many games they won with their black cat shrines up! (Disclaimer: I have no idea how many games they won with their black cat shrines up, I just saw pics on tumblr.)
Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-28 21:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-28 21:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-28 21:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-28 21:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-28 21:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-28 21:37 (UTC) - ExpandRe: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-28 22:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-28 22:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-28 22:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-28 22:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-28 22:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-28 22:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) - 2016-05-28 23:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 10:11 pm (UTC)(link)Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)Frivolous reason for the Sharks to win: will Sidney Crosby touch the Prince of Wales trophy in the future? How will the luck compute in his strange little brain?
Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)This is truly a noble reason to want the Sharks to win - For Science.
Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-28 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)He will blame the black cat.
Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-29 01:17 am (UTC)(link)http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/stanley-cup-final-preview--who-has-the-better-celebrity-fans-003802256.html
Of most interest to me by far is that Kristi Yamaguchi is married to the Sharks' color commentator, whom she met at the 1992 Olympics when he was playing for Team USA.
Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-29 06:20 am (UTC)(link)...isn't that basically the plot of The Cutting Edge? (By which I mean, that's adorable.)
Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-29 05:06 am (UTC)(link)Just dropping this here cause it's relevant to like 30% of this thread at this point, but I couldn't decide which subthead to leave it in.
Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-29 09:04 am (UTC)(link)Re: who should win the Stanley Cup - a VERY SILLY THREAD
(Anonymous) 2016-05-29 09:37 am (UTC)(link)