#24 – Not Sure If Serious or Playing Dumba

[dekedangle_rpf_mod]

This is the twenty-fourth post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.

THE RULES

1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means. 
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.





Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">

If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post. 

Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View

Next post opens at 5,000 comments.

Comments

Re: Random Hockey Thread

[(Anonymous)]

http://thesinbin.dreamwidth.org/3790.html?thread=4481486#cmt4481486

Does anyone remember that story of where he met the gay couple on the plane back from Paris and they told him they got married on Consol ice and he thought that was so cool?

What? When did this happen?

Re: Random Hockey Thread

[(Anonymous)]

It wasn't the couple, it was only one of the husbands. It was when Crosby was flying back to Pittsburgh after his post-Worlds Euro trip. The tweets about it have since been protected, but maybe someone has the screen caps.

Re: Random Hockey Thread

[(Anonymous)]

No tweets. But here's the story.

http://www.pittsburghmagazine.com/Best-of-the-Burgh-Blogs/Beyond-the-Cookie-Table/February-2016/Real-Pittsburgh-Weddings-2016-Seven-Adorable-Moments/

Re: Random Hockey Thread

[(Anonymous)]

Don't mean to hijack this thread, but that tumblr in the prompt! The way they've phrased that post really grates on me. Five pictures of Kathy & Sid and ends with the text I understand and support them being private, but they are really nice together. I wonder how she thinks she is supporting them being private. Does she just mean she is not complaining bitterly about it or what? She recognizes their right to try?

I don't know that they actually are attempting to be private, but if I thought they were I would not be simultaneously posting pictures of them while declaring my support for their privacy like I deserved back pats.