Whereas Landeskog and Sharp I recognize as "conventionally" good looking, even though they don't do anything for me, but I don't understand how anyone finds Seguin "objectively" attractive at all. Like, I get if one personally finds him attractive, I have favs who I think are objectively not conventionally attractive, but they're attractive to me. So I have to agree with the anon who said there's not really such thing as objectively good-looking -- or I guess, that what "objectively" good-looking is is still a subjective thing, even if it's a different thing from the phenomenon where your average-looking favs are really attractive to you.
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
Re: Things You Wouldn't Say Unanon
From: (Anonymous)Whereas Landeskog and Sharp I recognize as "conventionally" good looking, even though they don't do anything for me, but I don't understand how anyone finds Seguin "objectively" attractive at all. Like, I get if one personally finds him attractive, I have favs who I think are objectively not conventionally attractive, but they're attractive to me. So I have to agree with the anon who said there's not really such thing as objectively good-looking -- or I guess, that what "objectively" good-looking is is still a subjective thing, even if it's a different thing from the phenomenon where your average-looking favs are really attractive to you.