dekedangle_rpf_mod: mod icon of a puck by a goal net on ice (puck on ice)
[personal profile] dekedangle_rpf_mod posting in [community profile] dekedangle_rpfanon
This is the twenty-sixth post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.

THE RULES


1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means. 
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.





Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">

If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post

Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View

Next post opens at 5,000 comments.

Re: Fandom Venting

From: (Anonymous)
Lmao, no, they didn't? Vagueblogging isn't twitter specific. People even vague post here, and it's generally not met well. If anything, it hints at tumblr. But whatever.

It's not entitlement or demanding to say you dislike how someone conducts themselves (but uh if that's how we're defining it...). There's no expectation of change. I definitely have no interest in engaging with them, because clearly how we use socialize is very at odds.

Re: Fandom Venting

From: (Anonymous)
I misremembered because of the direction the conversation took, but being tumblr and not twitter doesn't actually change things. We certainly weren't talking about the fic discussion thread.

It's not entitlement or demanding to say you dislike how someone conducts themselves (but uh if that's how we're defining it...). There's no expectation of change.

No, no one said dislike = entitlement. No one disagreed with people who said they disliked seeing vagueblogging. But saying "having a single coherent thought about an established subject isn't really all that much to ask for" is an expectation that is entitled when people aren't writing for you. There is no expectation that every single tweet or tumblr text post is supposed to have coherent thoughts about established subjects. Calling people names and making assumptions about their intelligence because they want to be able to say "ugh I didn't like this" on their blogs or twitters without explaining themselves to you, a random stranger, is both entitled and over the top.

Re: Fandom Venting

From: (Anonymous)
da

Also, disliking the practice of vagueblogging because of its pettiness, smallmindness, propensity to generate wank, whatever, and judging someone who engages in it excessively =/= being upset that someone expressed an opinion, even a negative one, on their personal social media without "context" or "support" or ~contributing to a conversation that they aren't trying to have or providing constructive criticism or analysis that no one is paying them to provide. "No one expects professional reviews, but..." blahblahblah is a reasonable thing to say if you're talking about, like, Amazon reviews or AO3 comments, but saying that about someone's personal social media is assuming that that social media exists for your edification, which it doesn't.