dekedangle_rpf_mod: mod icon of a puck by a goal net on ice (puck on ice)
[personal profile] dekedangle_rpf_mod posting in [community profile] dekedangle_rpfanon
This is the twenty-sixth post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.

THE RULES


1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means. 
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.





Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">

If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post

Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View

Next post opens at 5,000 comments.

Re: Game day thread 18 Sept 2016

From: (Anonymous)
Well, if people want to keep Fleury around (and Fleury has been quoted that he'd like to finish his career in Pittsburgh, so there's that) that means they are at least implicitly arguing for trading Murray, since Fleury has to be protected because of his NMC and losing Murray for nothing is hardly a good option either.

Re: Game day thread 18 Sept 2016

From: (Anonymous)
Well, the other option would be see what they'd have to give Vegas to get them to agree to not draft Murray.

Re: Game day thread 18 Sept 2016

From: (Anonymous)
I think people are severely underestimating what that would take. There are a lot of really naive assumptions being made about this (my favorite is that Fleury will waive his NMC so he can be exposed to the draft out of the goodness of his heart) but that one is a kicker.

If you are GM George McPhee, formerly of the Capitals that have been getting their skulls kicked in by the Penguins for ages, what do you ask for in return for leaving a 23-year-old franchise goaltender on the board? If you're Foley, a new owner trying to make sure your team has a hook in an impossible market, what do you let McPhee ask for in return for leaving a franchise goalie on the board?

Re: Game day thread 18 Sept 2016

From: (Anonymous)
ayrt

I agree that a lot of the proposals are really naïve. I mostly mentioned the possibility as something people proposing to keep Fleury could have in mind other than trading Murray.

The idea that Fleury will let himself get drafted to Vegas is not realistic, but if he has a good relationship with the FO and trusts them, it's not totally outside the realm of possibility that he could waive his NMC with the promise that the Pens will give something to Vegas to not draft Fleury, which ought to be less costly than Murray. Fleury might prefer to take that chance rather than a trade, if a trade becomes a concrete possibility. But I also don't think Murray's quite proven himself to be a franchise goaltender yet. If he doesn't have a good year, his trade value might dip a little.

Re: Game day thread 18 Sept 2016

From: (Anonymous)
In the last expansion draft San Jose traded a player, a third and a seventh rounder to one team for not taking Nabakov, plus a player, a third and a ninth to the other team. So, there are definitely deals possible.

Re: Game day thread 18 Sept 2016

From: (Anonymous)
Yes, plus the Pens will only have to bribe one team, who should in theory have a better pool of goalies to choose from than in the last expansion draft, since no team can protect two goalies, and Vegas is the only team picking?