#16 – Luck Be a Ladd-y Tonight
Nov. 2nd, 2015 08:35 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
dekedangle_rpf_mod posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
dekedangle_rpfanonThis is the sixteenth post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)You're assuming that pretty much everyone has a pot. I'm not sure how that's a more legitimate assumption than that people who cook rice have a rice cooker.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Rice cookers were only widely available on the market beginning in the late 40s/early 50s. It's a convenience, and some people are against them because they were taught to use a pot. They're hardly ingrained in our national consciousness (unless you live in Asia). Not everyone eats rice frequently enough to need a cooker. Not everyone can spare the space for an appliance (with admittedly multiple uses).
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Because a rice cooker is mostly used to cook rice, whereas you can make basically anything in a pot. My kitchen is populated entirely by borrowed or thrift store utensils, I literally own three plates, and I still have two pots, because I need to make pasta and soup and other dishes in order to have food to eat. However, I have never considered getting a rice cooker, because a.) space in my apartment is so incredibly limited that I would have to store it on the floor of my bedroom and b.) any money I have is either spent on things that are necessary for my continued existence (groceries, rent) or things that will actively bring me joy (candy, alcohol). A rice cooker falls into neither category, so I'm not getting one.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)If someone cooks anything ever, they likely have some kind of pot. Pots are used to make a great many things. They are versatile and common pieces of kitchen equipment. Rice cookers are near-ubiquitous in some areas and for some cultures and not so much for others.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Now you're just trying to play the devil's advocate. If a person is in the position where they can cook for themselves on a daily basis, they own a pot. You can buy a pot for a dollar if need be (a shitty pot! but a pot nonetheless). Pots are versatile and be used to cook almost anything. Rice cookers are not. They have one function, and that's all, and are not cost effective when you're on a tight budget if rice is not the main staple of your diet.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Hey! You can use rice cookers to boil eggs and do several rice-based meals and steamed veggies too!
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)