dekedangle_rpf_mod (
dekedangle_rpf_mod) wrote in
dekedangle_rpfanon2016-05-20 08:02 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
#24 – Not Sure If Serious or Playing Dumba
This is the twenty-fourth post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 12:38 am (UTC)(link)I general enjoy watching hockey, doesn't matter who's playing, but I've been very annoyed at seeing the Pens in the final. Leading me to not watch much of the SCF. To see the rating makes me wonder if people share the same views. Or NHL is bad at marketing itself.
Also, Sharks aren't an exciting teams compare to their NBA counterparts.
Which as a fan of hockey this makes me worry about the future of this sport.
Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 12:43 am (UTC)(link)That said, I highly doubt the low ratings have anything to do with the fact that people find the Pens annoying. I think both the Pens and Sharks are great teams to watch for casual or new fans, and this is a great matchup in that regard.
Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 12:54 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 01:11 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 01:13 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 01:15 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 01:23 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 10:32 am (UTC)(link)That's a large chunk of the NHL's viewership gone, right there.
Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 07:19 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 01:25 am (UTC)(link)I would be watching any other SCF match-up, but I just don't want to watch the Pens any more than I have to (i.e., when they're playing my team), and clearly my hatred only fuels the teams I dislike. I'm not going to stand between Thornton and his Cup. But I doubt Pens-haters all happen to have Nielsen boxes.
Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 01:36 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 01:37 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 01:48 am (UTC)(link)That's why "old people" shows like the 80th season of NCIS do so well - because the Nielsens are, for the most part, still accurate for those over the age of 50. Just not so much for anyone below that.
Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 01:53 am (UTC)(link)Yep. I don't have a cable subscription, and I know quite a few other people around my age who are the same way.
Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 01:55 am (UTC)(link)For the SCF so far at least, the first game went up against a much more watched NBA playoff game. The second one was on NBCSN, which is apparently only part of the more expensive cable packages. Those things surely didn't help.
Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 01:59 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 02:02 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 02:20 am (UTC)(link)Where it helps is with the 18-35 age group shows. That's who advertisers want, and their favorite shows will almost never look good on Nielsen. So now there's another thing networks can use to sell things that couldn't air on CBS.
Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 01:54 am (UTC)(link)Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 02:15 am (UTC)(link)yeah, I think hard core sports fans tend to overestimate how much impact they have on ratings and marketing. That sort of thing is built on the casual fan.
Re: Fandom Venting
(Anonymous) 2016-06-04 02:01 am (UTC)(link)