dekedangle_rpf_mod: Hanson Bro from Slapshot (pic#7957183)
[personal profile] dekedangle_rpf_mod posting in [community profile] dekedangle_rpfanon
This is the twenty-fourth post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.

THE RULES


1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means. 
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.





Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">

If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post

Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View

Next post opens at 5,000 comments.

Re: What is <i>up</i> with your team? –– non-SCF edition

From: (Anonymous)
ayrt

I parented up and reread and they pretty much said exactly that -- that if the Hawks' model isn't sustainable, they don't see why it matters because even if they come in last next year, they will start to rebuild. Whether you count a quick rebuild/rebuild on the fly as a rebuild, or only starting from scratch/getting rid of the core (I don't think the semantics of it really matters), the point is that it's going to be incredibly hard for the Blackhawks to do either of them for a long time.

Re: What is <i>up</i> with your team? –– non-SCF edition

From: (Anonymous)
I'm... still not seeing that at all, but okay, buddy.

Re: What is <i>up</i> with your team? –– non-SCF edition

From: (Anonymous)
so it could end tomorrow. Not sure why it matters, though. Even if they get absolutely crappy and come in last next year and get the first overall pick, the three cups won't be rescinded or anything. And they'd just start rebuilding.

You could actually read the thread in question. But ok, buddy.

Re: What is <i>up</i> with your team? –– non-SCF edition

From: (Anonymous)
Meh, what's a quick rebuild? Has any team successfully done that? Maybe the Lightning could count? I don't think a quick rebuild is realistic for any team regardless of what contracts they have.

Same to you!

Re: What is <i>up</i> with your team? –– non-SCF edition

From: (Anonymous)
Are you seriously not actually reading the comments together as a conversation and understanding what they're responding to? You said that something wasn't said that clearly was said. The debate over what actually constitutes a rebuild doesn't actually have anything to do with what (you were so confused that) airt and I were discussing (which I already explained to you wen you said you didn't understand how we weren't saying the same thing). If you're going to butt in to a conversation you clearly haven't followed the thrust of, at least don't be snide about it.

Re: What is <i>up</i> with your team? –– non-SCF edition

From: (Anonymous)
This comment is so ironic. I kept up fine, although now I can see now how the first AYRT rolled their eyes and backed away. Keep hacking at those windmills, Don.

Re: What is <i>up</i> with your team? –– non-SCF edition

From: (Anonymous)
I'm fairly sure the original AYRT wasn't saying it wouldn't be a big deal if the Blackhawks sucked and got #1 next year,

Clearly your reading comprehension skills are strong.

Re: What is <i>up</i> with your team? –– non-SCF edition

From: (Anonymous)
^u^

Re: What is <i>up</i> with your team? –– non-SCF edition

From: (Anonymous)
Fairly sure that has to do with how successful their "model" has been. You got a whole lot from a throwaway comment about what happens after a good team is no longer good.

Re: What is <i>up</i> with your team? –– non-SCF edition

From: (Anonymous)
NA

A full on rebuild would be hard to pull of for the Hawks for years to come, what with all the NMCs, no? I don't know enough to make a judgement as to whether a kind of like this years Penguins re-tooling over a course of one season would be feasable.

Re: What is <i>up</i> with your team? –– non-SCF edition

From: (Anonymous)
Person who made the comment.

The AIRT is correct.

I think your confusion is that you seem to be mistaking the idea that something is important or special or that it matters with being slow and dragged out? Which doesn't really have anything to do with what I was talking about. I'm not saying that the Hawks rebuild isn't a big deal, because I think it will be quick. I'm saying the Hawks rebuild isn't a big deal, because all teams do it and the Hawks at least have their cups. More recently than 30 years ago even.

Re: What is <i>up</i> with your team? –– non-SCF edition

From: (Anonymous)
SA

Of course that was supposed to be that the AYRT is correct.

Re: What is <i>up</i> with your team? –– non-SCF edition

From: (Anonymous)
But I said multiple times that I don't think it matters whether the rebuild will be quick or slow and dragged out? It doesn't really have anything to do with what I was talking about, either, and I said that. MY point is that I think (in my opinion! which can be different from other opinions!) that the rebuild (slow or quick, whatever rebuild they want to do) IS a bigger deal than you think it is in your opinion, because all teams do it, yeah, but the Hawks are in a uniquely bad position where they won't be ABLE to do it for a long time. No team has as many NMCs as the Hawks, etc., etc. But like I said upthread, yeah, they have their cups, so no matter how badly they bungle it, it was still worth it.

Re: What is <i>up</i> with your team? –– non-SCF edition

From: (Anonymous)
AYRT

Then the confusion is that that's not a uniquely bad position. Rebuilds take time for all teams. If it wasn't one thing, it'd be another.

Re: What is <i>up</i> with your team? –– non-SCF edition

From: (Anonymous)
But I'm not arguing about whether or not rebuilds take time!! I'm NOT saying the Hawks' position is bad because their rebuild will be slow. I know that full rebuilds do take time for all teams! But they also require moves to carry them out, and my point is that the Hawks will mostly not be able make those moves because of their contract situation (which yes is uniquely bad, because no one else has that many NMCs, that many 10.5 mil contracts, or that many long front-loaded contracts subject to recapture), or if they do, those moves will continue to hurt their future a lot going forward. I think that because they know they cannot rebuild, they will try to contend, and that will hurt them.

You said that IF the Hawks are bad and get the first overall pick, then they will start to rebuild. But you generally only get bad enough for the first overall pick if you are actively trying to rebuild (in a way the Blackhawks can't for the foreseeable future), or if you have made a disaster of not rebuilding and trying to be good (which will be costly and hurt the rebuild going forward). You don't have to think any of that is important in light of three cups, given how many fans would probably agree to never win again in exchange for that. But you seem to continue to think I'm saying something that I'm not, even after I repeatedly clarify. I'm not "confused" simply because I don't agree with your assessment of what will happen to the Blackhawks post-Cups. Plenty of fans know the experience of perpetual mediocrity that only hurts the team's future going forward, and that's what I think will happen to the Hawks, not Cups --> bad --> start a rebuild. Let's just amicably agree to disagree on that.

Re: What is <i>up</i> with your team? –– non-SCF edition

From: (Anonymous)
AYRT

Look, if you're not arguing about the timing, then why are you putting Cups ---> bad --> rebuild in my mouth and saying you disagree with it when you could just as easily acknowledge mediocrity is often a stop on the way to bad?

Second, there's no such thing as *perpetual* mediocrity. No team goes eight years without either making the playoffs or falling down the standings.

My point is it doesn't matter. Whether they are terrible for the next 8 years or only sort of good or win another cup, eventually they will start rebuilding as all teams do, and unless it takes them more than 30 years, it won't be the least bit remarkable. The Hawks are not special snowflakes of handicappedness.

Re: What is <i>up</i> with your team? –– non-SCF edition

From: (Anonymous)
ayrt

I think you still haven't understood what my point is re: badness versus mediocrity and the Hawks' contract situation, which is maybe my own fault by this point. Maybe the issue is partly that we clearly understood different things by mediocrity. If perpetual mediocrity means eight consecutive years missing the playoffs (in a league where more than half the teams make it) but not falling down the standings, sure, no one does that. I was thinking also of fruitless and inevitable-feeling first-round exits, or like someone else commented, years of unmemorable mediocrity and a 12th to 16th overall first round pick. But we clearly aren't getting anywhere with this, so like I said, let's just agree to disagree.