#26 — Vanek! with a Jurco
Jul. 12th, 2016 04:32 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
This is the twenty-sixth post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)I'm also not sure that the existence of big pairings necessarily lead to a sense of community across hockey fandom as a whole. The popularity of K/T or S/G is pretty irrelevant to people who wrote for different teams in the first place. And people write for the pairings they love, even though it might be only five other people into the pairing.
Within say the Pens fans it may be harder now to find someone who shares the same pairing, but it really doesn't change anything for people who never wrote Pens anyway.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)I think you're right that there were always people on the periphery and more likely to feel alienated than included by the juggernaut pairings, but I don't think I agree that big pairings don't lead to a sense of community. I think your observations would be right if fans tended to be segmented into groups that all share one team and read and write fic about that team and those players, but that's never been the case. A lot of fic writers who've written for a large variety of pairings have also written S/G and K/T, and a lot of people who aren't Pens or Hawks fans or who would never write those pairings themselves have read that fic nonetheless and formed fandom connections that way and have common reference to certain "big name" authors and fic. So yes, the general existence of juggernaut pairings does mean a random fan is more likely to find someone who likes the same pairings, especially because people don't choose pairings in a vacuum, they often become interested in pairings because someone else in fandom is interested, too. (Just not a particular person who doesn't care for any of those juggernaut pairings.) I think activity around juggernauts also creates a lot of general fandom growth (not just Pens and Hawks fans -- plenty of people discovered fandom that way and moved on to other teams and pairings), while activity around many rarer pairings is less likely to do that.
It's the nature of a community that some are included and some are excluded, so for people who never had anything to do with the juggernauts, I wouldn't be surprised if many feel like not much has changed. But even as someone who made a lot of effort to avoid one of those juggernaut pairings, I never felt its popularity was "irrelevant" to my fandom experience because it was everywhere, I couldn't block or mute everyone who talked about them because I would be blocking nearly everyone who wrote the fic and pairings that I was interested in. I do think there are tangible effects of the juggernauts' declining popularity that go just beyond Hawks fans and Pens fans. Or maybe I'm just mistaking causes and effects.
I do agree that juggernauts and variety aren't a zero sum game. I think some of that perception probably comes from the feeling that someone writing a pairing you aren't interested in could be expending that effort to write a pairing you like instead (see: attitudes towards oflights).
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Oh geez, I'm sorry this became an essay, I hope it doesn't seem like I'm trying to be argumentative or Vehemently Disagree with you, your comment just sparked a lot of thoughts, is all. I'm not trying to declare the death of fandom because people don't write my pairing anymore, just trying to capture why I feel that something about this fandom has changed, not necessarily for the worse imo.)
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)That makes sense! But I think you're maybe using the word "community" differently from how I am, and it's possible that I used it differently from how others others meant it? I feel like there was more of a sense of community when the juggernauts were more popular, and that people were not as loosely dispersed. But I didn't necessarily "feel community" as something that I had. I understood the a-airt-rt as saying (amongst other things) that fandom felt more cohesive before and feels more spread out into smaller groups now, and I agree and in a lot of ways find that more pleasant to deal with.
I know a lot of people got into non-juggernaut teams and pairings and stayed attached to those pairings even though they came into fandom through juggernaut fic, but I suspect that that also happens less often when the juggernaut activity declines. But I think maybe I conflated fandom size/growth with the idea that there's a sense of fandom community.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)So there are many people who do have shared experience of specific works or authors but does it make a difference if K/T or S/G continues to be produced? That I'm not so sure about. I'm not really into twitter so perhaps that reduces the impact on me.
I think it'll be interesting to see if it is a shift in focus, and a new juggernaut pairing will emerge. Or if there will be a greater number of different smaller ships. I'm not sure if it's just a decline of juggernaut pairings or if it's a result of the rift in the fandom which is impacting the sense of community. There do seem to have been more team specific exchanges for example this year, but it is difficult to determine cause and effect.
I think there will be some occasions when you wish someone would write the pairing of your heart rather than a different pairing.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)That's a good point about how people engage in fandom. It would be a really different experience for someone whose fandom participation also included twitter and tumblr, versus someone who might just read and write fic for particular players they care about. I guess I was thinking more of the former than the latter.
My theory is that fewer people will be drawn in by non-juggernaut teams and players in the first place than the amount of people drawn in by juggernauts who then move on to those other teams/pairings. But that's only my perception. Like you, I'm curious to see what happens next. And that's a good point about cause and effect -- it's easy to see, for example, why something like the Kane allegations would fragment the sense of "community" and contribute to the decline of K/T as a juggernaut pairing.
Oh, I agree, and I've felt that way about my favorite pairings too! I just thought it might be one thing subconsciously influencing conflating wanting the juggernauts to decline with wanting more variety of pairings.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Like the other anon I entered the fandom through recs on FFA and I had no idea who the people were, but there was more to read for that pairing than say a rare pair. But the players I ended up liking most and the team I follow aren't the ones from the first fic I read. I am sure if I had connected to one of the teams with a juggernaut pairing my perceptions would be different.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Oh, I wonder if this is at least as much a question of how people engage in fandom, then. The reason I feel so strongly that fandom had a wide sense of community was how impossible it was for me to ignore the juggernaut pairing I didn't care for, not being attached to a juggernaut pairing/team. Even people I followed who weren't attached to that juggernaut-containing team frequently engaged with the players/pairing and their fans, even some who claimed not to like one of the players involved. But my problem with fandom was also the same as my general problem with tumblr, which is the impossibility of shielding yourself from certain content/people without cutting yourself off from what you want to use tumblr for in the first place. Obviously that wouldn't be the case for someone who engages less in that platform and who mainly reads and writes fic, and I hadn't thought of that.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)I don't know about this. To use your example, I really think a lot of the entitlement people show about oflights switching ships is that she left a juggernaut, and she switched to something that supposedly breaks the juggernaut up. I've seen people subtweeting to that effect a lot and the comments on here sometimes seem coded that way. It's not just "ew I hate that ship", it's also "poor Geno, she needs to be nicer to him."
I sometimes wonder if Sid/Nate would be bigger if someone with less fandom baggage coming from a lesser known pairing started writing it and promoting it the way she does. So many people hate Sid/Nate because they see it at the expense of Sid/Geno. And that kind of resentment doesn't build across different rare pairs IMO.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)I'm pretty sure people who hate the juggernaut being split up will hate the splitting up even if it's coming from a NNF. There might be less sense of betrayal, though.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)S/G fans don't virulently hate Sid/Claude, though, except maybe a small amount of Pens fans who don't like it because of the Pens/Flyers rivalry? But you'd think that Giroux being a Flyer/the pairing's most popular fic being written predominantly by Flyers fans would make the pairing less popular than Sid/Nate amongst S/G fans.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)I... don't agree with this at all. I don't think this line of thinking is the cause of antipathy towards Sid/Nate, I think it's more likely to be the result of it...
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Re: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:15 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:20 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:25 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:32 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:39 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:49 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:55 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:12 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:16 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:26 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:31 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:41 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:45 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:47 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:51 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:34 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:59 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 02:23 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 02:33 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 02:50 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 04:14 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 02:31 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 04:06 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Re: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:42 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:05 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:44 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:52 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:53 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:57 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:53 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:56 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:54 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:56 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:00 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:15 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:16 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:18 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 10:37 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 05:15 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 05:19 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 06:17 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 09:53 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 10:51 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 11:04 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 11:31 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-10 12:02 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-10 04:44 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-10 06:07 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-10 03:34 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-10 03:42 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-10 03:53 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-10 05:30 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-10 09:43 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-10 12:14 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-10 04:09 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-10 04:11 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:19 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:30 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:38 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 02:01 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 02:10 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:00 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:02 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)I have a few theories on this. One is what the other nonny said, which is that Sid/Nate has way more of a basis in reality than Sid/Geno and is therefore more threatening so there's resentment/jealousy. Sid and Nate have a lot of off-ice footage and promo together, more than Sid and Geno have ever had.
The other is that the oflights Sid/Nate content and the way she talks about them seems really Nate focused, and I don't think enough people care about him for that to be the hook. She seemed to shift her focus from Sid to Nate (and other people in his world like Barrie, Drouin and Landeskog) and that's a tough draw for Penguins fans who care about Penguins only, which was a lot of her audience. There aren't enough Avs fans to make up that difference, especially Avs fans who care about Sid.
Re: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:50 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:57 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:00 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 01:09 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)But there are some who really hated Sid/Ovi, when people still wrote that. I can't really peek into people's brains and know why they dislike Sid/Nate but are okay with Sid/Giroux, but I don't think it's just because of a BNF promoting the former. It's not like disliking a ship that splits up your ship is not commonly disliked across all of fandom.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Re: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:12 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-09 12:17 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Oh, I see what you mean about Sid/Nate and I think you're right. But I also think that the attitude of "Why is she writing Sid/Nate when she could/should be writing S/G instead?" is a big part of it, too, and I feel like I've seen lots of comments to that effect here (idk about twitter). Also, though, my view of oflights' particular situation is probably being colored by her fandom history, because she got accusations that she was killing TSN fandom when she transitioned to hockey and S/G. Idk the way people talk about oflights is just generally crazy. Still, I think it's not just an oflights thing but a more general feeling that fandom sometimes has when a popular author stops writing for a certain pairing/in a certain fandom.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)I feel like we have this conversation any time someone brings up Sid/Nate, but I will say it again: I think a lot of people just aren't interested in Nate, specifically. I have a million and one Sid pairings I like. Sid/Nate just isn't one of them. If you want reasons, there's the significant age difference plus the fact that I just don't find Mackinnon attractive plus no relationship dynamics that interest me. And other people speaking up have said the same in the past.
Oflights might be a little different than most just because she was one of the most prolific S/G authors for a long time, but in general when I've seen S/G authors write other pairings involving one or the other character, nobody's given them that much grief. Nobody got pissed (that I know of?) when thehoyden wrote Sid/Jack for an exchange last year, for example.
Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)Re: Fandom Venting
From: (Anonymous)As anecdata, I got into hockey via an S/G rec, which led me to read all the other S/G fic. If there hadn't been that bulk of S/G fic to read and the activity in the tag to watch out for, I don't think I'd have stuck around long enough to get invested. Definitely reading an S/G fic would not then have led me to read a random Stars pairing, for example. I'm pretty sure that's the case for a lot of people.