#26 — Vanek! with a Jurco
Jul. 12th, 2016 04:32 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
This is the twenty-sixth post of Deke Dangle RPF Anon, a community for all your ice hockey anon meme needs.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
THE RULES
1. Mods retain the right to delete, freeze, and/or screen threads and comments.
2. Meme rules do not require warnings.
3. Respect flock. Do not repost or share information from private tumblrs, locked twitter accounts, flocked LJ posts, etc.
4. No linking fans to their real life identities.
5. No looks bashing or body shaming. This applies to players and people associated with those players and their clubs, as well as fellow fans.
6. No embedded music.
7. No embedded images.
8. No spamming the meme, whether through repeated comments or other means.
9. No discussing trolling, individual trolls, or their efforts.
Meme rules do not require spoiler cuts. However, this layout does allow for them. Any of the following tags will create a spoiler cut when closed: <div cut>, <span cut>, <font cut>, <font color="white">
If you have any questions or concerns, please direct them to The Mod Post.
Threaded View
Flat View
Top-Level Comment View
Next post opens at 5,000 comments.
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)📣 Mackinnon has outplayed McDavid 📣 and it's really not as close as ESPN would like you to believe.
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)What killed me was the entire line got virtually benched in the third. Their line was responsible for two of the three goals (Mackinnon especially) and one on the PP, and they had to watch McDavid and the rest of the chosen ones play monkey in the middle for 2 minutes on that 5-on-3. Garbage. They drew the first penalty, they should have been out to start.
If Gaudreau is mad about his ice time, he has a point.
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)I suspect Larkin was benched because of the two goals against in the second, and if they're not starting a tired goalie, it's probably not an issue.
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)The crazy line shuffling McLellan's doing is killing me, honestly. The lines he had versus Finland were good! They worked! I don't understand what the point is of making weird shifts in the middle of the game, usually for no discernible reason other than "McJesus hasn't scored yet, why?". I know they're young and adaptable, but LET IT BE, TODD.
And don't even get me started on the ice time. Gaudreau has been playing practically perfectly and sits. Drouin has been good too, and hardly even touched the ice in the third!
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)I think it's mostly just McLellan being blinded by McJesus, though.
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)I wouldn't be surprised if the NHL also wanted McDavid featured. They seem heavily invested in the "next one" narrative.
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)At least this is all proof the Oilers will be trash again this year. That coaching, woof.
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)(Assuming Gaudreau gets signed, that is.)
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)/the battle of Alberta is real yo.
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 03:17 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)Actually a lot of meme's comments already having me feeling bad for McDavid
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)I feel bad because I think he won't be able to lead up to the level of hype heaped on him.
That being said, I don't think he should be excused from critical analyses of his play because of the hype.
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)IA. The hype is so huge though. So many people expect him to win the Art Ross next year. He could, but I don't think he will. But so what if he doesn't. He's got nearly a decade before he's even considered in his prime.
Everyone just wants it for him so badly. I think it'd just be better for him if they just gave him regular hockey player chances instead of "It's okay, you're so great, buddy" ones.
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 05:12 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 05:51 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 05:58 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 07:06 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 02:09 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 02:36 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 03:57 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 04:00 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 04:07 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 04:52 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 10:16 pm (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-21 12:15 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-21 12:20 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-21 12:21 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-21 12:21 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-21 12:22 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-21 12:22 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-21 12:55 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-21 12:25 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-21 02:38 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-21 12:07 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-21 12:10 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 06:25 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 07:11 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-21 12:07 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 05:50 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)Yeah, I get why people are sick and tired of the media narrative, but the guy himself has already had a pretty rough start, really. I wouldn't wish more on him.
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)I don't have the raw data, but I've been looking at @IneffectiveMath's charts from the game: https://twitter.com/IneffectiveMath/status/778065966387331072
(Also this isn't to say that people shouldn't question the decision to shorten the bench -- Matthews and McDavid are young guys, with very little NHL experience, playing back to back, and the team is stacked with talent. But I haven't seen stats yet that bear out that another line was more effective.)
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)Again, I'm not saying the benching was the right decision (I think it was silly), but Larkin along with Eichel had the lowest possession % (~20%) among NA forwards through two periods. (The Drouin benching was more of a mystery to me, totally unfathomable.)
My only point is that there are stats suggesting that McDavid's line was the best one, so I think it's unfair to answer the question "Are there legitimate reasons to play McDavid more than others or is this just asshole coaching?" with the assumption that the only reason McLellan gave more time to McDavid was because of favoritism of a player on his NHL team, and to say that "numbers" don't back it up.
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 05:42 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 05:46 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 05:59 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 06:07 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 06:23 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 06:26 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)Thanks! That's much more info than I had before.
Also, ouch, that graph seems to be suggesting Eichel should have been benched over Drouin. I thought he looked a little rough during the second period, but not worse than anyone else.
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)Wonder if the two big hits took a while to shake off, too.
Re: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 05:19 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 05:25 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
- From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2016-09-20 05:33 am (UTC) - ExpandRe: Game day thread 19 Sept 2016
From: (Anonymous)